 | | Re: LDView command line snapshot scaling
|
|
(...) What units does the -ModelSize argument use? (...) Thanks for the examples! Those are helpful. Your recent changes must indeed have fixed something relevant; the images I generate with the first few example commands are very large (and not to (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 1970s sets in microscale
|
|
(...) IIRC, wasn't there some pics of somebody's micro SW MOCs on Brickshelf a long time ago - they used a 1x1 brick for a Tie Fighter (or something like that)? It was pretty funny seeing one part MOCs like that! (URL) (19 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 1970s sets in microscale
|
|
(...) I initially was trying to build a *micro* Constellation, but by the time it was finished I thought the model better deserved to be called a 'mini'. Of course, this brings up the entire debate about what scale is micro, what is mini and so on. (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView command line snapshot scaling
|
|
That's a first for me. The web Preview of my previous message looked different. The images were all placed on the line after their associated command line, which was what I wanted, and made it easier to read. --Travis (19 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView command line snapshot scaling
|
|
(...) fine, as long as you set x to be big enough. With the current source code, -cg (with radius) should also work fine. Despite the fact that -cg was documented to support the radius part in LDView 3.1, it in fact didn't. I fixed that, but perhaps (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
