|
|
 | | RE: robotic rovers
|
| Ian Warfield wrote: > Incidentally, has anyone tried to combine a rotation sensor and a touch sensor > on the same input? I've tried programming a sensor task routine to separate > the input signals based on RAW voltage but it's not fast enough to (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Robots Design LEGO Structures All By Themselves
|
| Evolution, until now the unchallenged domain of living organisms, may soon become possible for robots as well. So say computer scientists at Brandeis University, where a simple computer-based form of evolution -- nature's own design strategy -- has (...) (27 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
|
| Any motion between two hard surfaces, including sliding metal on metal (often called contact wiping), creates intermittent contact that has to be "debounced". The only switches that don't bounce are mercury-wetted contacts, such as one used to find (...) (27 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Space Shuttles in 6339 and 6544
|
| Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37C6E2DC.6576E9...ger.net... (...) I put the stickers on mine, and if you want to have a complete fleet (I like how that rhymes), pick the current Idea book. It has stickers for number 1. Dave (27 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Climbing robot?
|
| (...) Well, my initial thought is that a simple climber is one that has an inchworm-style motion - open upper gripper, extend the upper half, close upper gripper, release lower gripper, contract body to raise lower gripper, close lower gripper, (...) (27 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Skipped 2 messages in
group
lugnet.admin.statistics (Skip-filter settings)
|
