 | | A quick afterthough on - Ideas for a RIS 2.0
|
|
Anyone who is seriously involved in designing new sensors etc for use with the RCX could probably do their own RCX replacement as well? There's a thought! JB -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC at the NMRA National Convention
|
|
When I worked in the factory (12 years ago) we had no contact with the brick molding people. We knew where they were, and every once and a while one of them would come out with a dumpster of deformed bricks. It looks like maybe a Chistmas Eve raid (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Ideas for a RIS 2.0
|
|
More I/O ports would be handy. But a little ingenuity can expand on what is already provided. What cannot be expanded is the memory capacity of the RCX, or its processong flexibility. The idea of simply using the RCX as an interface between the I/O (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
|
|
Nate Ridderman wrote in message ... (...) How about rechargeable RCX and IR tower with a regular power supply? Best regards, David List (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Scale of figures
|
|
Hi John, John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:37B97414.D15859...est.net... (...) You really crack me up :) I almost thought you were going to say that the technic dudes can't keep their hands off the Belville babes and they had to (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
