 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) A little - the next question of course is: Can NXT1 be both slave (to NXT0) and master (to NXT2, NXT3, NXT4) at the same time? Or does that require sneaky protocol to switch between the 2? ROSCO (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: My First few NXT MOCs
|
|
(...) Dave (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Dave, I don't know a whole lot about BT (beyond the little I've found out because of this project), but your assessment is correct. The protocol is implemented according to BT spec, so all communication is done through master-slave (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Ok after actually reading the other threads in this post, it looks like TLG decided to develop its own BT profile just for the NXT. The messaging mechanism described by Brian and Steve looks like it will allow direct slave-slave communication, (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Quite muddy! Why only three connections and what about specification adherence? Are they trying to limit its potential applications or were they just trying to get out a production-ready implementation? In other words are there plans for an (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
