 | | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) For what its worth this is one thing I have asked specifically about and have yet to get an answer. If there were a really good rechargable battery would that make a differance. My feeling is that it depends on the following. 1. Pulling power (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) Particular products may be "no longer available", but the *system* is still available. Just because the friendly N-scalers at the next layout are running a locomotive that was last sold in 1985 doesn't change the fact that there are hundreds (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Ummmm Timbort, if you're gonna jump in on a thread, you better be darn sure you get yout facts straight: (URL) were probably tricked by the shading on the reply quotes - unfortunately on Lugnet, matching colour does NOT mean matching (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) Todd- IR is cheaper and easier than R/C. R/C requires regulatory approval in many places (like the US) and frequencies must vary with country. IR can be the same everywhere and requires no approvals. Of course IR has the disadvantage of being (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
"Todd Thuma" <thumat@gactr.uga.edu> wrote in message news:Iwus58.yn2@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Bluetooth would have been the right answer! Mike (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
