 | | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) For what its worth this is one thing I have asked specifically about and have yet to get an answer. If there were a really good rechargable battery would that make a differance. My feeling is that it depends on the following. 1. Pulling power (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) Particular products may be "no longer available", but the *system* is still available. Just because the friendly N-scalers at the next layout are running a locomotive that was last sold in 1985 doesn't change the fact that there are hundreds (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Ummmm Timbort, if you're gonna jump in on a thread, you better be darn sure you get yout facts straight: (URL) were probably tricked by the shading on the reply quotes - unfortunately on Lugnet, matching colour does NOT mean matching (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) Todd- IR is cheaper and easier than R/C. R/C requires regulatory approval in many places (like the US) and frequencies must vary with country. IR can be the same everywhere and requires no approvals. Of course IR has the disadvantage of being (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
"Todd Thuma" <thumat@gactr.uga.edu> wrote in message news:Iwus58.yn2@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Bluetooth would have been the right answer! Mike (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) I asked other members of RichLUG to respond last evening so we could reach consensus. So far Rich and Dustin have responded: Rich - I don't believe that our club would disband over this. If it was a decision by consensus to use the new train (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Bricksmith 1.3: Here's Looking at You, Kid
|
|
(...) I don't think it has to be. My friend made me a parts list from MLCAD and it was arranged alphabetically by part description. I think it would make the most logical sense to sort a parts list by part number. Russell (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) So what are you saying? 0.0737087601KG in G is about 73 G. thats means, (useing your chart) with 3 motors, and 1 rcx, you have 73 grams left. with 73 grams, you can have 1 lx, one touch and one rotation sensor, (20 g) that leaves you with 53 (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Motor Being Discontinued?
|
|
(...) Just a thought question from this: What do folks think about the fact that almost every other model railroad displayed at a train show displays obsolete, no longer available products? How about the American Flyer folks, or the vintage Lionel (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | SCLTC Thomas the Tank Engine Weekend at LLCA Photos
|
|
First photos of SCLTC's Thomas the Tank Engine display at LEGOLAND California on March 25/26 are now up (URL). (6 URLs) The weekend was an enormous success for the park which enjoyed two of its four highest attendance days ever! -Ted SCLTC (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org.scltc, lugnet.org.us.lugola, lugnet.build, FTX) !!
|
