|
|
 | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) Actually, there's really no easy way to do part detection, but filenames really aren't a good idea. I'm pretty sure Lars is fully aware of the part detection problem (since it also affects the seams option in L3P), and there have been (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Scorpion
|
| Eric Sophie schrieb: (...) It is now on the parts tracker. mikeheide (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) Surely the very fact it is .ldr instead of .dat differentiates it from the lego parts. MLCad doesn't recognise 3010.ldr as a valid part, and it allows both blah.dat and blah.ldr in the same mpd file. (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
| (...) Nice to see them (URL) using a CC2800>, although it is a bit scary being able to identify a crane from such a distance... ROSCO (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) I agree with that - it's much easier for the user to eliminate such conflicts (eg call the set file set-926.ldr) than expect the software to make such decisions for you. ROSCO (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
|
