|
|
 | | Re: Mini moonbase, anyone?
|
| (...) Sure, I've already emailed the programming person. Depending on when she next gets a chance to look at it, I'll hear from her on the idea. It has the advantage of not being something we've done recently, that I remember, which is always good. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.loc.us.co)
| | | | | Re: Where do we go from here...
|
| (...) What the heck does that mean?!? Jude (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca.on)
| | | | | Re: Mini moonbase, anyone?
|
| (...) Well, you're in the Fort Collins area IIRC, so if that happens, you can come on over to my house sometime (or vice versa) and well have a mini-micro-moonbase with just whatever the two of us have built! Best, — Joe (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.loc.us.co, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Mini moonbase, anyone?
|
| (...) I would vote for (a) or (b). I'm thinking cheap and informal since we don't really have much in the way of experience doing public displays. I'm making the assumption that we're coming into this late in the game. Maybe next year we could be a (...) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.loc.us.co)
| | | | | Re: Moonbase standard
|
| (...) There are still other standards. A bunch using another standard have been brought to various SeaLUG meetings. As far as I know, there hasn't yet been any notable discussion of the merits of the various standards out there. -- Tony Hafner (...) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.space)
|
|
