To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *507919 (-5)
  Re: Thoughts
 
(...) Someone here did develop one a few years ago. It was *almost* pure-Lego. The problem is to find a decent way to capture the air under the hovercraft - whilst keeping the thing light. If I recall, that was done with cling-film. The other (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Thoughts
 
(...) Possibly - there have been attempts in the past, try this link: (URL) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
 
(...) They're fun, interesting and good for creativity. (...) The large amount of good piece/price ratio sets, particularly designer (...) The magazine, it is a load of rubbish full of poor writing and minimal content. There is no 'general interest' (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  RE: Thoughts
 
(...) Yes. Look at (URL) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: US MOC loco numbering
 
(...) I just liked the number-- it's palindromic fun! :-) For the most part, actually, I choose that number for the ease of it. On the decal itself, there were 2 numbers "8003", along with the usual 0,1,2,3,4.... Now, obviously, one can create any (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

Skipped 1 message in group lugnet.admin.general (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR