 | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) The big question is, why arent LEGO trains available on the retail shelves? I suspect part of it is because LEGO trains as a rule are expensive. Expensive compared to other LEGO sets (due to the cost of the electrics) And more to the point, (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Yeah, I can never remember how to attach gdb to a running process, so that one isn't in my usual bag of tricks. I'll have to try harder to remember it next time. Fortunately for me, Kevin already found the bug in lpub. :^) Don (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Australia is definitely not the unique case, but more likely the typical case. In the US, most consumers can only buy Lego trains online or from S@H. During the holiday shopping season, TRU may carry trains, but other than that, trains are (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
I've snipped all the rest away because I agree with it, close enough, and I want to focus on one thing... (...) THe following is my view but I believe it's pretty widely shared. LUGNET is (especially when it's working right) a meritocracy. You get (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote: I just timed rendering of all the pedmatic construction step images and part list images and the process took less than 3 minutes! Amazing. After I debug ldglite and ldview on windows 98, then I'll work on the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
