 | | Re: O'Reilly magazine, "Make"
|
|
Heh... funny... I'll be curious to see how I'm mentiond when my issue arrives... MAKE contacted me briefly, but they never followed up on my reply... so I caan't imagine what is being printed. eric (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
Too complicated for adults? Or too complicated for children? Did LEGO determine that the automated parts were too complex for their target audience (children?) Assuming it is *financially viable*, why can't LEGO have introductory train sets for (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) How's this for a "big risk": I say, scrap the 9 volt system, and produce specialized train parts (from the trucks on up) that are to scale with "O" gauge. Have AFOLs use existing trucks, motors, couplers, and track currently used (and already (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Those were deemed too complicated and that's why they're not in the 9V system anymore. (21 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase demonstration module
|
|
(...) I saw this whilst looking through the moonbase stuff. I really like the blue-shell-over-greebling look. Can you use the grey stands to separate the units vertically and miss out a floor? Or can you build a few vertical connectors too? It (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
