 | | notice
|
|
unsubscribe (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, in fact I do. (...) They hold my 4-year-old son's attention much longer than most toys. It's also something he and I can do together, for many hours, so it's a great bonding experience as well. (...) For kids, I'd get a bit more licensing (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes (...) Because I think it is amongst the best products for enabling kids to use their imaginations. Because I'm an AFOL and because my enthousiasm for the product is obvious to kids, they seem more interested themselves. (...) I hate to say (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
Jake McKee wrote: > > Thanks so much everyone for showing that the AFOLs are a force to be reckoned > with! > > * Would you buy LEGO toys for children 0-11? Y/N Yes. > * Why / Why not? > Lego is a toy range that gains value with every set you buy, (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on Train Wheel Diameter, Minifig Scale
|
|
(...) Tim/Lar/John thanks for the info. I suspected the wheels were undersized. Ignoring the track, I'm curious now which ratio is more prototypical: LEGO wheel-diameter to 6-wide locomotive/rolling-stock or LEGO wheel-diameter to 8-wide? I guess (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
