|
|
 | | Re: "odaibacontest3" Japanese group contest
|
| In lugnet.build.vignette, Bruce Hietbrink wrote: SNIP (...) There a few more shots of Sigezo's entries: (URL). It's very cool how those 'vignette-y' MOCs were done on a larger scale (even larger than the (URL) guidelines> listed in our FAQ). Too bad (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.loc.jp, FTX)
| | | | | Calum!
|
| Check your email settings! I can't get anything through to you. It's all bouncing back, saying I'm spam. :) Iain (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Compact dozer design
|
| (...) What exactly is the advantage of using the adder-subtracter design versus the motor-for-each-track design? Let me guess; does the adder-subtractor design produce slow changes in direction while the motor-for-each-track design only makes quick (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
| (...) How about some of (URL) these> in white lined up on the deck? Great work, BTW. Are you planning on doing any other ships? An entire micro carrier battle group would be pretty impresive. Marc Nelson Jr. (URL) Marc's Creations>> (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
| | | | | Re: USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
| (...) well, version 1 was waterline and upwards only, link: (URL) and yes, the scale is to small to make microscale planes, they'd need to be somethin like 2 studs long and 1.5 studs wide, which would be just a little bit hard to do. thanks! -mark (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
Skipped 4 messages in
groups
lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)
|
