 | | Re: What if.....
|
|
(...) I suggest 5 for the width (hey, half stud offset!), in case someone is swivelingright up to the edge and is using this inside an 8 or larger wide creation. (21 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) But not one single eensy-weensy bit of NQC ends up in the robot - it's just a tool. This is the HUGE misunderstanding that people seem to have. NQC *isn't* somehow loaded into the robot. Are you telling me that I can't use any TOOLS that (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) I don't follow your logic. Are you saying that any change to the rules to allow non-LEGO programming environments that target the standard LEGO firmware (including ones that they encourage people to use by selling tutorials for them on their (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Wanted to trade: 6090 Royal Knight's Castle for Mindstorms.
|
|
The 6090 Castle is still up for trade if anyone wants to trade it for a Mindstorms 1.0 or even 1.5/2.0 kit. All serious offers will be considered. Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) First off, judging the technical merit of a program of any significant degree of complexity by simply looking at the code (be it text-based or graphical) for 20 minutes or less is nonsense. The only judging of that sort that ought to occur (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
