 | | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Erm, yes, point taken. ;-) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) I dunno if it was so much a question of being right or not-- I think the difference of opinion was "is this a big deal" or not. There was some disagreement about whether or not they made any "promise" to us that they broke in re-releasing the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Ahh yes. I recall last year someone posted an announcement 'transcript' from a Danish newspaper claiming lego was going to change its brick geometry. (...) Since when are juniorised models 'something' anyway? ;-) Unlike Kelly I was lucky (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Large numbers of early april dates are usually a good indicator... :-) (...) Hmm... I got a very nice juniorised model and advice that there was nothing wrong with my browser. :-) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Wishful Thinking press release (was: Maersk Second Run)
|
|
(...) Yep, it's a pastiche. I clicked too... then I read the whole thing, and it became fairly apparent it was a humor piece. But he did set the FUT to lugnet.fun.holiday, but I'm not sure what "holiday" was for ;) Kelly (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.color, FTX)
|
