 | | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
news-gateway@lugnet.com wrote on 01/10/2005 10:01:48 AM: (...) thus the (...) module, (...) or 90 (...) That assumes that there is nothing in front of the hopper. There is nothing to say that you are limited to a module 32 studs deep. If you choose (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: TGBC - The Weakest Link?
|
|
<SNIP> (...) Like a train layout, how about routing/switching module to create multiple ball routes? This way, if any one module acts up, only modules affected in that path need to be dealt with. Given the standards (regarding input/output bin (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone know Redjack Ryan?
|
|
(...) His name is Alex Taylor and he recently came to an IndyLUG show and became interested in joining our club. I'm not sure if he checks LUGNET that often (at least not yet, I'm sure he soon will!!) I can forward you his e-mail address if you'd (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) Not to oversimplify, but I mean if the 'standard' for the ball contraption is 32 studs from the front of the hopper to the back edge of the baseplate, and thus I personally would probably grab a 32 x 32 stud baseplate to build on, thus the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone read Danske Modelbiler?
|
|
(...) Hi, If you are familiar with the 60's steerable vehicles (331-337), the steering mechanism on these earlier ~1:40 (non-constructional) vehicles of which you enquire was quite similar. The triangle sign on the cab roof is the user control, as (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.dk)
|
