 | | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) I think you can handle this with a little care in the design of the rules. If the table you are setting it up on is deep enough to permit it, you could always use four 90 degree pieces in a LEFT/RIGHT/RIGHT/LEFT sequence to keep the overall (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Beeesh
|
|
(...) snip That's pretty awesome, Eric. There's always cool new stuff to see on your big, non-violent, bug-headed giants. Here's what I liked: The spooky grungy location shot, cool! The first documented cool use of the new Alpha team canopies. The (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) Yeah - I agree. You need the 'average builder' to stick to a simple straight-line standard one-size-fits-all module. If you don't then everyone will want to build something esoteric and you'll get hardly any simple modules of the kind that (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Teikiatsu Mech and Armature Frame
|
|
(...) That's a great frame to build from, and the new color scheme is a huge improvement. One of these days I want to try one in dark blay and orange, with white accents. I'm not really feeling the big gun, but otherwise very good, creative work. (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) Instead of that, just make sure that your module delivers through the "side" of the downstream module's territory. In other words, using a chute (even a very short one) is a pretty easy solution. And that way the standard isn't further (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
