|
|
 | | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
| Daniel Rubin wrote: > In person, they look OK, less cartoony anyways. It's a pretty decent model of a (...) All of the above should be present in the larger Technic version. Jindroush www.kostky.org - for Czech Lego fans. (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005)
| | | | | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
| (...) The part looks great. As far as file size, I don't think 29.2K is too large at all, especially for a complicated curvy part like this. Others may disagree but I thinl that quality should never be sacrificed for file size concerns. -Orion (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Thanks rtl(rlt, wink)Toronto
|
| (...) We've been in bed together... You said you liked it. So we've established that part. (...) Well, not so much worth it but I gots da sheets, baby! (...) Yeah, we worry about Steve sometime--think his wife isn't giving him enuf work to do around (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: No one asked...
|
| Cool. But where's the gutter train! I like the guy chilling in the center. Derek (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: I love Lego
|
| Buh-bye. (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
|
