| | Re: Amazon... si, ma quale?
|
|
(...) sdoganameto... (...) Mmmm.... la ragione per cui ho posto la domanda è che i prodotti editoriali (tra i quali non sempre il software è contemplato) spesso godono di alcuni vantaggi... anche fiscali. Il mio dubbio era fondamentalmente in (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
|
| | When (if) to use optional lines?
|
|
I am just about to finish development of a fairly complicated piece (24-tooth gear with 3 axlesholes), and in looking at previous posts and documentation I have seen some talk about optional lines. Currently I have not used them at all. What are the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Need for rect primitive with two or one edge?
|
|
Assuming these don't already exist (I looked for rect2.dat on Parts Tracker, but could find nothing -- speaking of which, the "complete" unofficial parts zip seems to be out of date, since it is missing some stuff): Would it be reasonable to create (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: New MOC, Kalamazoo County Courthouse
|
|
(...) Hi David, Very nice! Lots of detail! I really like using plates for roofs & like how you've done it in some areas. The cornice work is very attractive too! Something to be proud of. Congrats! Best, Jonathan (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.town)
|
|
| | [PT]: Comments on updated 7026.dat
|
|
(URL) suggest it should be renamed to 7026cc01.dat to conform to Steve's own suggestions in an earlier thread. Description should be: "Window Classic 1 x 2 x 2 Short Ledge" Error: Short ledge should not be pointy. Comment: I doubt that thick walls (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Lost parts during shipping
|
|
(...) I haven't had problems with receiving Lego items in envelopes - the few order's I've received have been in padded envelopes that didn't get (too) mangled by the USPS. I do remember one particularly horrible shipment I received in a Priority (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
|
| | Re: Meeting on Jan. 29
|
|
(...) <snip> Patrick, we missed you but it's very understandable! Better luck next time we all hope. Jim and all, this was loads of fun, let's try to do another meeting soon. In fact since the RI worked out so well maybe we could try to plan for a (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.loc.us.pa.phi.har)
|
|
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Øyvind Steinnes writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|