|
|
 | | Re: roll call (27 more needed?)
|
| (...) Sorry, i re-read it and i can see it was a bit confusing. heres a clarification: The MM does not strike my interest as much as the IOM did when i first discovered it. I do think it is a good idea, and is a good group idea, but i, personally, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | [rtlToronto] Watch Chris and Calum make fools of themselves
|
| Hey folks, For those of you in the Toronto/Ottawa/Ontario area with access to CHUMcity stations like the Pulse24, NewVR, CityTV, the NewRO (we think), we'll be making an appearance on BreakfastTV, a regional early morning television show, tomorrow (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.announce)
| | | | | Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent?
|
| I want to buy some 1x4x3 wall elements for building a skyscraper. What looks better: the clear ones (3507) or the tinted blue ones (3447)? (22 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent?
|
| I want to buy some 1x4x3 wall elements for building a skyscraper. What looks better: the clear ones (3507) or the tinted blue ones (3447)? (22 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Which 1x4x3 is better for skyscrapers: clear or transparent?
|
| I was leaning towards the clear ones since they're a "neutral" color. Do the clear ones make the skyscraper look goofy? "Amy Hughes" <lugnews@amyhughes.org> wrote in message news:H8znBt.JF@lugnet.com... (...) one (...) the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
|
