 | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Excellent analysis, Frank! I just have to question whether people will pay 75 for a push train when for 60 more they can have the excitement of powered operation. Why did Duplo go powered? When I was buying Duplo for Taya (9 years ago when she (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) I suspect that an unpowered train wouldn't exist to serve the 'system OK, power bad' market segment, but rather the 'train set under $120 (US)'. If LEGO were able to release a complete train set (more than 1 car, and track oval) for (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
|
| | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) While we're asking, why did *Brio* go powered?? To me, Brio was the last hold out of the old-school, traditional toy train. But have you seen Brio lately? (Have you seen Brio *prices* lately?;) Not what we played (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John R. Clark
|
| | | | | | This may want to followup somewhere other than trains, but I can't decide where... (...) I think you'd be wrong there. You think you'd enjoy it, but you wouldn't. Because after turning the train on, what is there to do? Nothing, really. Powering (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Of course the powered DUPLO train is battery powered. They do still have a push train (though it doesn't come with track - a good decision for DUPLO I think, at that age, kids may not need a track). One thought I have is that many LTCs could (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
