To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 21872
     
   
Subject: 
Re: Motorizing 9V switch points (translation from french)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:01:09 GMT
Viewed: 
2384 times
  

In lugnet.trains, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=16648

This method overrides the switch leaver mechanism completly, and just pushes the
bit of spingloaded movable rail (the tongue) with a minifig spear.

Advantages: No modification, and still very little power needed.
Drawbacks: Train can't push the switch open when it enters the switch from the
non set direction, and electrical power routing is disabled.

Hello Manfred,

I was finally able to get a micromotor to test this solution. Thank you for the
pointer. It is quite difficult to find micromotors around here (in France). And
it seems impossible to buy from Pistco/Dacta for French import, at least based
on the information given in Pitsco/dacta website.
I need 16 motorized switch points for my layout, this turns to be quite
difficult. But Bricklink can be of some kind of help.

After testing, the problem of derailing when running trains in the reverse
direction is a problem to me. I think if people are willing to go using such
kind of motorization, they should consider John Hill's solution, recalled in
this thread (<http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=21822>) and make some kind of
mix, using the micromotor idea you mentioned with John's idea of using a short
length of string and a dab of glue.

Cheers,

Philippe

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Motorizing 9V switch points (translation from french)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:32:46 GMT
Viewed: 
2362 times
  

In lugnet.trains, Philippe Label wrote:
[snip]
After testing, the problem of derailing when running trains in the reverse
direction is a problem to me. I think if people are willing to go using such
kind of motorization, they should consider John Hill's solution, recalled in
this thread (<http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=21822>) and make some kind of
mix, using the micromotor idea you mentioned with John's idea of using a
short length of string and a dab of glue.

True, I can imagine the concerns. I saw the "micromotor/minifig spear"-type of
motorisation being used on a DDC layout, where a possible derailment problems
are prevented by the automated switch and signal operation.

With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen.

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR