Subject:
|
Re: Australian road train
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:02:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7514 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.town, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.town, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
A different sort of train but still six-wide ;)
|
Very nice, but let’s be honest here-- it may be six-wide, but it is 8 wide
scale:-)
And its 6 wide containers would look spiffy on
this:-d (hmmm,
intermooodal:-d)
JOHN
|
lol.
I just look up the dimensions of these things and they’re restricted to 2.5m
wide including mirrors. 8 wide is about 0.8 studs to the foot for US trains
(IIRC) so 7/0.8=2.66m so you’re right.
I thought these things were bigger. They sure don’t look only 2.5m wide.
Tim
PS. As for containers I’m getting quite keen on 5-wide containers for six-wide
trains. 4 wide doesn’t cut it and 6 is too wide.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Australian road train
|
| (...) Very nice, but let's be honest here-- it may be six-wide, but it is 8 wide scale:-) And its 6 wide containers would look spiffy on (URL) this>:-d (hmmm, intermooodal:-d) JOHN (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.town, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
