Subject:
|
Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:20:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7365 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi.
Gravity generators per se are not in violation of the laws of physics.
However, they are far in advance of any current technology that we have. In
order to generate an artificial gravity field, without the use of
centrifugal force, we'd have to create and manipulate graviton particles.
For each of the fundamental forces, there is a fundamental boson which
carries the 'information' from one particle to another. How do two electrons
know how to react to each other? The photon 'carries' information from one
electron to the other, 'telling' it about the existence of the other
particle. How do two bodies know that the other exists, and that it's
attracted to it? The graviton 'carries' that information.
The only problem is, we haven't even seen the graviton in an experimental
situation. We are not even vaguely close to some method of generating or
manipulating gravitons, in order to create an artificial gravity field in
space, or on the earth. Our very first application would be some method of
'blocking' the gravitons, so that we could create zero gravity on earth. The
possibilities of that would be endless, and whoever could make such a device
would swiftly be Richer Than God.
Since no such device is currently being fitted to 747's, I think it's a safe
bet to say that artificial gravity in any form does not exist. Apart from
using centrifugal force to 'fake' it. Even that isn't in use in space
situations.
later,
David Drew.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse Alan Long" <joyous4god2@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:01 AM
Thank you, Bill, for telling me what the name of that technology was in my
letter. There is a fatal flaw in your response, however, Bill. You seem to
think that it is impossible to conduct this type of technology yet you
already answered how people, at least with the technology that we have
developed in society, could develop such an "artificial gravity" system. I
am not sure how that the gravity generators are a violation of the laws of
physics so please explain this logic to me, Bill.
Jesse Long
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) The first issue in this reply is no person can become richer than God because God gave people the concept of money and currency in their minds. I could devote a whole other letter about this situation but I am not talking about religion in (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) Thank you, Bill, for telling me what the name of that technology was in my letter. There is a fatal flaw in your response, however, Bill. You seem to think that it is impossible to conduct this type of technology yet you already answered how (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
195 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
