| |
Steven Lane wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Eric Sophie writes:
>
> > Interesting , but we need one for Lego! I do see what you are saying, and
> > It is an interesting solution,, although a little hard to visualize...Thanks!
>
> I was going to say this solution is easy, but then I tried it. There are
> only two shaft's in this example. As lego don't make don't make a 'double
> width gear' You'd have to use four to make it in lego. All you'd need is
You can use those half beveled gears(with the recess) back to back as one gear,
and one (maybe 2) crown gears as the gear on the other shaft. It depends on what
the setup requires as of gear setup to work.
Andy
>
--
MIME ATTACHMENTS DISCARDED:
1. Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 938
|
|
| |
cool idea.....
In lugnet.robotics, Andy Gombos writes:
> Steven Lane wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.robotics, Eric Sophie writes:
>
> >
> > > Interesting , but we need one for Lego! I do see what you are saying, and
> > > It is an interesting solution,, although a little hard to visualize...Thanks!
> >
> > I was going to say this solution is easy, but then I tried it. There are
> > only two shaft's in this example. As lego don't make don't make a 'double
> > width gear' You'd have to use four to make it in lego. All you'd need is
>
>
> You can use those half beveled gears(with the recess) back to back as one gear,
> and one (maybe 2) crown gears as the gear on the other shaft. It depends on what
> the setup requires as of gear setup to work.
>
> Andy
>
> >
|
|
|
