 | | | | | |
In lugnet.org.glug, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.org.glug, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> > Registration renewal for gamelug.org is coming up next month, is anyone still
> > using this? Or should I let it lapse?
>
> Don't let it lapse! We'll pass the hat if we have to. In my view, it's a good
> thing to have, but we mostly use the yahoo group for planning and stuff.
The money's not a problem, hosting is pretty cheap. It's just that it looks
like the site's sole function for the last two years has been to plug GLUG's
'upcoming' Gen Con meeting for July 2003.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org.glug, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> In lugnet.org.glug, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.org.glug, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> > > Registration renewal for gamelug.org is coming up next month, is anyone still
> > > using this? Or should I let it lapse?
> >
> > Don't let it lapse! We'll pass the hat if we have to. In my view, it's a good
> > thing to have, but we mostly use the yahoo group for planning and stuff.
>
> The money's not a problem, hosting is pretty cheap. It's just that it looks
> like the site's sole function for the last two years has been to plug GLUG's
> 'upcoming' Gen Con meeting for July 2003.
True. (well, not "sole", there are a few links there too, but ya) I think that's
because no one has the bandwidth to take on putting more content there. I still
think it's a good domain to hold on to. Let's take this to the list, maybe
someone could be persuaded to at least update to GenCon 2005 and put in some
info about the org...
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.org.glug, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> > In lugnet.org.glug, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.org.glug, Mike Rayhawk wrote:
> > > > Registration renewal for gamelug.org is coming up next month, is
> > > > anyone still using this? Or should I let it lapse?
> > >
> > > Don't let it lapse! We'll pass the hat if we have to. In my view,
> > > it's a good thing to have, but we mostly use the yahoo group for
> > > planning and stuff.
> >
> > The money's not a problem, hosting is pretty cheap. It's just that
> > it looks like the site's sole function for the last two years has
> > been to plug GLUG's 'upcoming' Gen Con meeting for July 2003.
>
> True. (well, not "sole", there are a few links there too, but ya) I
> think that's because no one has the bandwidth to take on putting more
> content there. I still think it's a good domain to hold on to. Let's
> take this to the list, maybe someone could be persuaded to at least
> update to GenCon 2005 and put in some info about the org...
Good plan. Of course if the money is coming out of Mike's pocket, we should
pass the hat...
Frank
| | | | | | |
