To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 10023
10022  |  10024
Subject: 
Re: not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 22:08:24 GMT
Viewed: 
774 times
  
Steve Hassenplug wrote:


I just thought I should warn anyone who is thinking about this approach...

I did some quick calculations.  It seems if you use the rnd(7) approach to
programming, and a robot with just a little brain plays red, the rnd(7) robot
will LOSE on red's fourth move 76% of the time.

hmm.  Maybe that won't work so well...

hummmm

lets see,

76% - 100%

equals,

umm,

sec.....




carry the 3......

ummmm

OK my RND(7) robot would have a 24% chance of beating your robot.


WOW.

steve if your robot would lose to me 1 in 4 times, then i gotta say that your robot
sucks.


Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!)
 
(...) More like a 24% chance of NOT LOSING BY THE FOURTH MOVE. lol Mike (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!)
 
(...) I just thought I should warn anyone who is thinking about this approach... I did some quick calculations. It seems if you use the rnd(7) approach to programming, and a robot with just a little brain plays red, the rnd(7) robot will LOSE on (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

6 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR