|
|
 | | Re: LEGO "Man Cave"
|
| (...) lol you sound like an audition for (URL) Bad Idea Jeans>! JOHN (12 years ago, 3-Feb-12, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO "Man Cave"
|
| (...) John, You, me, and Dave, with maybe Janey at the table - what could go wrong!? Chris Pie Judge B.E.D. (12 years ago, 3-Feb-12, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO "Man Cave"
|
| OK, OK, make that 3'x3' pieces! 8P (...) F*ck the napkin!!! (...) (12 years ago, 3-Feb-12, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Finally! Obama gets his priorities straight!
|
| Without further comment (2 URLs) JOHN (12 years ago, 6-Jan-12, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Sticker background color (request to Standards Committee)
|
| (...) Snip Do you have an idea how that should work? The only thing I can imagine is that the whole library has to be made for that case as there are maybe references that has more than 8.3 filenames. And the result could not be shown on other (...) (13 years ago, 4-Feb-11, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Sticker background color (request to Standards Committee)
|
| (...) Even I have given that issue up now. :) I'd say we make a utility program that converts long names and references to them to 8.3 names, for the few special occations that will be necessary. (...) Wow! That's so utterly cool. I'm able to run (...) (13 years ago, 2-Feb-11, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
| (...) Actually, I have built them: (URL) HERE>, (URL) HERE>, (URL) HERE>, (URL) HERE>, and a few others which I have yet to photograph. I'm not really going public with it until I finish a few locos. So there. JOHN (13 years ago, 26-Jan-11, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
| (...) You maybe should get Ross to build them. Less talk, more build. (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) Actually, if the "pure virtual function call" error really did come from LDView, then it indicates a bug in LDView, no matter what the contents of the files being fed into LDView. The only way that LDView could generate such an error that I (...) (13 years ago, 6-Dec-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) Well, that's a healthy and robust system you have there, Dave! As always, I endeavor to crash that system prematurely;-) JOHN (13 years ago, 5-Dec-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) Thanks for your concern, but my system can tolerate one such grudging admission every twenty-four months or so without going into fits. In fact, I gave Dave K his props just over two years ago (URL) here,> so I should be okay until after the (...) (13 years ago, 5-Dec-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) Ouch. That must have been painful for you to type, Dave! JOHN (13 years ago, 4-Dec-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) ....grumble.... The most damning part is that you may be indirectly correct. I haven't kept step with all of the whys and wherefores of the LDraw file-header conventions, so there may be a glitch resulting from my failure to match my custom (...) (13 years ago, 4-Dec-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) "PURE" is a dead givaway.... I think you left the next line of the error message out: R6026 -impure parts detected in library, aborting. Try removing all Mega***** from your libraries (and your house, while you're at it, for good measure) and (...) (13 years ago, 4-Dec-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Calling Out Dave!
|
| (...) YES! Diabolically brilliant, nest paw? JOHN (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Calling Out Dave!
|
| (...) Which Dave are you dissing? (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Calling Out Dave!
|
| Not only did he not read War And Peace, but he only skimmed the Cliff Notes for it! That is what I heard, anyway. JOHN (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) A little late on the reply here (missed this post), but here goes anyway: I don't see them as bad per se, it's just that they seem to be replacing LUGNET, because people only have so much time to devote to LEGO (what is wrong with these (...) (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) Editing goes against "the newsgroup spirit", which was a big deal to Todd... (and maybe that means the implementation of editing would be hard, I have no idea) But cancellation, if by the author, does not go against that spirit, in my view. (...) (14 years ago, 31-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) I also agree that Lugnet was THE place to go back in the day and I also wouldn't mind seeing it rise again. But I am just thinking that Lugnet's inability to edit and cancel posts will be a huge factor preventing it from being the proverbial (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
