|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 2.045) |
|
| | So now a change of opinion...
|
| Because I really have been thinking lots about this lately... As an aside (and before I begin) we actually did not drive through the states ON PURPOSE to get to the NovaLUG show in New Brunswick JUST because of your gun issues down there. So here it (...) (12 years ago, 5-Feb-13, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 1.817) |
|
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) I see that you are rebutting my "equivocation" with a straw man. Nowhere do I claim that the murderer is blameless, but I don't equate his "blamefulness" (sorry about that malapropism) with some "right" to execute him. And the person (or (...) (19 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.804) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.714) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.691) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.661) |
|
| | Re: Yahoo Sucks
|
| (...) No it wouldn't. The US government, and all lesser related governments (states, counties, cities, townships, etc.) are restricted from making laws that prohibit free speech on public property. No such restrictions are made for private/corporate (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.659) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.631) |
|
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
| (...) Apparently so. (...) It *seems* like a good idea, it *seems* like it might work. Because all rights are property rights and all that... Okay, so I accidentally kill my neighbour. Darn it, I say. I must make recompense for the killing. Do I (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.630) |
|
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
| (...) Ahh... so we can dispense with the beaurocracy do determine the price of the crime and build a judiciary instead. Seems like a good idea. But what is this mention of a criminal penalty? How does that fit with an 'all rights are property (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.628) |
|
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
| (...) Why would sarcasm be a reason *not* to take a comment seriously? (...) But it's okay simply declare that all rights are property rights and assign a dollar value for all transgressions, just because a capitalist government* happens to get into (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.628) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.625) |
|
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
| (...) <snipped the adultery bit> (...) Determined by a judicial process... so once again, you need a judiciary... and because your theoretical system is dynamic, values for transgressions need to be determined each and every time, so it's going to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.619) |
|
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| (...) Good points. I post on off-topic.debate irregularly, but view it often. If o-t.debate wasn't there it wouldn't worry me. However, like driving past a traffic accident, I try to ignore it - but I am constantly drawn back. The views expressed (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.619) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.607) |
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Perhaps you should re-read our own words then, before you dust off your old copy of Animal Farm. It was you who "assumed" that Richie was referring to doublespeak when he invoked Orwell. (...) Fair enough. But if we're going to start policing (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| rights, property (score: 1.600) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.597) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 1.594) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) Sure it is, if these individuals are stripped of all rights to trial. Bush is declaring "they're guilty because I say so, so we don't need a trial to hold them indefinitely." Sorry, but that's a pretty abominable statement for the leader of (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 1.590) |
|
| | Re: People are idiots...
|
| (...) True capitalism is more than just supply and demand, it requires recognition of property rights. Selling stuff that you stole is just thuggery or fencing, not capitalism. (...) All rights are property rights. What is right is to respect them. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.590) |