| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > <topped>
> > > Good. Then this subthread is over. Thanks for playing.
> > <tailed>
> >
> > Indeed. If you can not answer my points... there is no point.
>
> When you actually manage to coherently make a point that hasn't already been
> answered in depth, do let us all know, won't you? I won't be holding my breath.
OK Larry. I'll play your game again. Let's revist this message:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=8141
Specifically this text:
=+=
The point I was making about rights concerned political freedoms. For
example - here in the UK one could always choose to be, say, a communist.
Can you say the same of the US? Or did you not have rather unsavoury "witch
hunts"? I even hear that in some parts of the US, widely accepted theories
such as evolution are not taught to your younger generations - they are not
given the freedom to choose? While we are talking about education, when did
the US get rid of segregation in the education system? Despite that, I'm
pretty sure you'd say parents should be able to dictate what is taught in a
school, or even select the colour of little Johnnie's class mates?
=+=
It was your assertion that you were in some way freer than I due to your
constitution. My point above is that may not really be the case. Previously,
you chose to delete this rather than answer it. Are you willing to educate
me this time?
Scott A
>
> All the points I could glean from your ramblings have been answered. Pity
> you can't say the same. Now go waste someone else's time. I'll buy YOU the
> crayons if you like, no need to steal mine.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) I'm not going to play yours though, or at least I'm going to try very hard not to. Too disruptive. If someone else wants to try, they are free to give it a go if they like, but I see it as a waste of effort. Me, I've got better uses for my (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) When you actually manage to coherently make a point that hasn't already been answered in depth, do let us all know, won't you? I won't be holding my breath. All the points I could glean from your ramblings have been answered. Pity you can't (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
