Subject:
|
The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:04:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1071 times
|
| |
|
|
Case closed
Nevermind that Bennett is pro-life. What a smear. And even the Bush
administration runs for cover from political hack fallout. Brutal.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Well, let's be fair. Bennett's comments were so hideously ill-considered that only the most far-right of media outlets have come out in support of him. There's a lot of "what he really meant was" going on post hoc, but the bottom line is what (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Apart from the slightly sensationalistic title I don't see how this article is a smear at all. It is quite factual and clearly states that he qualified his statement. If you disagree with his anti-choice politics not being spelt out in the (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
