To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18430
18429  |  18431
Subject: 
Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the IRA?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:55:15 GMT
Viewed: 
1947 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Breaking my usual practice of ignoring you and your nonsense,

I find that comment a little disingenuous. To be honest, I wish you would just
ignore me.

To be honest I wish you wouldn't post on LUGNET(tm) at all, you're somewhere
between extremely low value add, and significant negative value add. Once in
a while you come up with an outside cite of some limited value but by and
large your own comments range from uninsightful to inciteful. Usually
tending toward the latter.

By and large I do manage to ignore you but when you're at your most
egregious... it's hard.

Call me on that if I’m wrong, otherwise I’d appreciate some clarification.

I'm comfortable that I found a cite that demonstrated that you were at least
trying to insinuate the matter in question. That you managed to weasel word
things so that you're technically not exactly matching what I said is, if
anything, a testimony to your own despicable debating techniques rather than
any fault of my own.

My expectation is that you will twist this around further, as is your wont,
but I am done.

Good day, sir.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I
 
(...) Give it rest. It's rather ironic that you don't see the irony in what you are saying. This sort stuff should be taken to e-mail. (...) Synopsis: You've admitted I was correct, and you were wrong. Furthermore; you're not happy about it. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the IRA?
 
(...) Heck, I ignore Scott, but judging by the flurry of responses, he won't do me the same favor. He wants and craves attention. Ignoring him is still the best option. He'll even pick up on long-distance, unstated twitting of his hypocritical (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the IRA?
 
(...) I find that comment a little disingenuous. To be honest, I wish you would just ignore me. (...) As I said, "I don’t think I have ever made any link between the IRA and American-Christians or even Irish-Americans [whatever they are] (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR