Subject:
|
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:23:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5444 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > > Back up there, schoolboy.
> >
> > Easy there, zealot.
>
> :-) Mine was a wordplay on "Schuler". The dirty dealer meant no harm...
Okay, I withdraw my sharp rejoinder. But I hasten to add that it may be
unwise to engage in name-based wordplay if one's name is John.
> > How about an alleged belief in Christ?
>
> Belief in *what exactly* about Christ? This is an extremely contentious issue
> among Christians.
Well, it would seem to me that a professed Xtian would have to believe, at
least nominally, in the divinity of Christ as the Son o' God. Lots of
people accept that Jesus the man existed. I do--I mean, why not? Muslims
generally accept it, and so do Jews, if I recall correctly. But was he
divine? That's another matter. Belief in the divinity of Jesus would
appear central, but if I'm wrong, please correct me.
Parenthetically, I seem to remember someone fairly highly placed in the
history of the faith (Paul, perhaps?) acknowledging that if the Resurrection
were false, then Xtianity on the whole would collapse. Ring a bell for anyone?
> > Your willingness to lump athiests into one bunch is exactly illustrative
> > of your bigotry
>
> Dave!! That is what *RM* did to Christianity, Jews, and Muslims! But all I
> hear is that *I'm* the "shockingly bigotted" one, and it's coming from *him*!
Actually, the way I read it, his post indicated an ironic turnabout by
grouping the various religions in the same way that athiests were summarily
grouped. Of course it's objectionable to homogenize a body of different
people; that's the whole point! Richard's post also pointed out the problem
of praying in glass churches: if one sees no problem in castingating a
group on the basis of a tiny minority of its members, then one must be
willing to condemn one's own group on the basis of a few of it's own members.
> > I would venture to say that in the history of the world the blood on
> > athiests' collective hands is a drop in the ocean compared to the blood on
> > theists' hands. Truly religion elevates the character of man to its noblest
> > stature!
>
> I doubt it, but I'm not sure I want to go there, or would see a point to it.
The point, simply put, is to demonstrate that it's shockingly bigoted to
accuse athiests in general of greater violence or bloodshed than their
spiritually enlightened peers. Even if we lump Pol Pot and Hitler(1) and
Stalin among "athiests," the number of dead at athiests' hands is still tiny
compared to those killed by "theists(2)," since I flatly don't believe that
every murder commited at those dictators' commands were carried out by
athiests, even if they were carried out in the name of The State. The
theists who committed those murders may have done so under duress, but they
are then hardly innocent of the killings.
> But I think that you are wrong WRT your facetious religion statement. Many of
> mankind's greatest literary (or whichever category you choose) achievements
> were done in the name of religion.
Speaking as a liberal arts major with a vested interest in this particular
topic, I say "so what?" If I paint a swell rendition of the crucified
Christ, does that mean I have carte blanche to commit centuries of brutal
murder?
Dave!
(1) Sorry Larry--I just can't stop mentioning Hitler in this
thread about persecution based on one's beliefs. Hmm...
(2) I know, I know--"I'm grouping theists under one heading."
Well, if the theist in this debate is okay lumping athiests
together based on their non-belief in God (however feeble
a unifier that may be), I think it's appropriate in this
discussion to group theists in a single category based
generically on their belief.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
