Subject:
|
Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:44:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
984 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.mediawatch, Curt Tigges writes:
> > I am shocked and disgusted at anyone who would be immoral and low enough to
> > display these films on the Internet. Even though I have not watched them, I
> > have learned enough reading this thread. It is not right for anyone to
> > display this trash anywhere. Legos were not meant to be used in digital
> > films filled with smut, they were meant for enhancing creativity through
> > building and designing. I hope nobody flames me for this, but if they do, I
> > will still stand by my opinions.
>
> I mean, after all, back in the
> 50's (or so) bikinis were indecent. Way back in the 20's, showing your
> calves (or was it knees?) in public was a disgrace. Supposedly there's blue
> laws in Boston about how couples may not hold hands in Boston Common
No matter what the standards of reavealing parts of one's body, depictions
of LEGO minifigs being gay and doing you-know-what-else is evil and immoral.
> What's an LDS?
A member of The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day Saints. In other words,
a Mormon.
>
> DaveE
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
