Subject:
|
Re: Put three libertarians together in a room and they won't be able to agree where to go for lunch...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:22:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
455 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry,
5 Points on this
1) A point of integrity : I think the description you give of who was
intended to take part in the survey is misleading (I base this on the link
you give).
2) A point of integrity : You describe the survey as "totally unscientific".
I am not sure what you mean by that, but I have to wonder why you have
treated us to a 750 word post based on an unscientific online poll data,
whilst you reject UN data as being specious?
3) A point of integrity : Do you agree that it is a little strange that
whilst the survey is "unscientific", opinion is quoted down to 1/10 of a
percent? I'm sure that the margin of reliability was far higher than that?
4) A general query : Why did the LP bother with this “unscientific” poll.
Are the issues not important enough to warrant a decent attempt? Perhaps
they were rushing to get on the 911 band-wagon? What do you think?
5) A general query : Given that the LP has had is views on race questioned
both here & on FreeRepublic.com in the past few days, do you agree that a
poll of the view of the party membership on that issue not be more
“interesting”? Perhaps it would help silence the concerns on non-LP members?
(mostly “unscientific” text removed)
> I think it's tiresome that we already said no to these and they're back
> again. Politicians will use any excuse to usurp.
If they have a democratic mandate and are mirroring the views of the people
is it usurping?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
