To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 2396
     
   
Subject: 
Re: Lego changes CEO after new losses
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.legoland
Date: 
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:41:53 GMT
Viewed: 
9745 times
  

In lugnet.lego, Ted Michon wrote:

   Spinning off the parks, or selling them outright, sounds ominous. It suggests a level of distress calling for drastic measures. I cannot imagine TLC divesting LL Billund because it’s so close, physically and emotionally, to the heart of the company and its history. But I could see LLCA gone in a hearbeat -- it’s a small kid theme park in very competitive market. Personally, that’s very sad. My wife and I just bought Ambassador passes only a few weeks ago. We aren’t interested in LLCA as a theme park, but as a link to TLC.

IMHO selling the LL parks to an outside company is just beyond stupid. I mean HELLO - this is LEGOland. This is not some generic theme park where it does not really matter who is running it - I don’t want to see LLCA run by some random company. What happens to THE major thing that keeps me buying year passes - the LL exclusive items, the S@H only sets at the parks - the things like the Classic Space hat that only LLCA has? What happens to those?

I would not mind seeing a new division within Lego to just run the parks - I think THAT is what the problem is they seem to be forgotten (noting the NUMEROUS broken parts within the attractions) and a division that has the sole responsibility of keeping the parks up would be the way to go. There may be one of them now, I am not sure - but if there is they need to do a better job.

I go to Legoland to go to LEGOland, not Legoland brought to you by Pepsi.

Mark P
http://www.promobricks.com

x-fut this part to .legoland

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Lego changes CEO after new losses
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.legoland
Date: 
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:25:46 GMT
Viewed: 
9885 times
  

In lugnet.lego, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
   In lugnet.lego, Ted Michon wrote:

   Spinning off the parks, or selling them outright, sounds ominous. >

   I would not mind seeing a new division within Lego to just run the parks - I think THAT is what the problem is they seem to be forgotten (noting the NUMEROUS broken parts within the attractions) and a division that has the sole responsibility of keeping the parks up would be the way to go. There may be one of them now, I am not sure - but if there is they need to do a better job.

I have some strong negative feelings about Legoland CA. I drove my kids (15 hours) specifically to visit Legoland (CA) and we were all looking forward to the experience. I have visited numerous parks in my 42 years and I must say Legoland was the worst park/ and experience I have ever had.

As Mark mentioned above I found numerous items broken. I was appalled at the number of displays that were broken and filthy. Handsel and Gretel had so many cobwebs and spiders on them it scared my 4 year old. The park in general was dirty, bordering on filthy. This includes building walls, rides, displays and trash around the park. (we were there at the opening and it was a really slow day for the park).

The employees were collectively the most appethetic uncaring group of employees I have ever come across. Most (9 out of 10) employees acted bored, were ignorant about their own park and basically did not appear to care about their job or park. For instance I wanted to get a mosaic of each of my two boys. I had three separate employees send me to three separate different parts of the park ( and I mean ALL over the park) and they were ALL wrong. One employee had never heard of the mosaic but he atleast called administration(?) on a park phone. They insisted the mosaic was in the Technic ride area. I mentioned that the Technic ride was closed and that it did not make sense that it was there, they (admin) insisted they were correct. (they weren’t) I finally gave up trying to find the mosaic.

I waited 5 minutes at a small shop in the Knights Kingdom area to pay for a shield and sword for my son. The cashier was having an intense conversation with her boyfriend about her personal life. Her boyfirend finally left and she then waited on me. (I timed the gal and I was standing right in front of her, the boyfriend was standing next to me)

The special fee charged for my 4 year old to brush dirt away in the dino dig area was down right insulting!

I could go on and on, but I will stop with the negative.

Positive

I did manage to find a few good employees. They guys running the Fire Station ride were enthusiastic and gave my boys and I a thoroughly enjoyable experience. These guys were just as enthusiastic at 10 AM as the were at 4 PM.

Some of the rides were fun and different.

Miniland had some great models and we really enjoyed looking at the models, however this is an area where many, many things were broken.

The most insulting experieince we had was an encounter with the park model builders. There were two builders and boy and an older woman. The boy was fairly new but he expressed extreme graditude for his job and he tried hard to talk with us. The woman was sarcastic and actually had the gall to complain about her job and how building the NASCAR signs was soooo hard and she didn’t like it. No one should complain about a model building job!

Maybe new management would improve the park. The current management is doing a poor job!

Rose

BTW I was just at the Park, September 24, 2004.

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Lego changes CEO after new losses
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.legoland
Date: 
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:52:51 GMT
Viewed: 
9984 times
  

Maybe they’ll sell it to Disney. They would fix it.

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Lego changes CEO after new losses
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.legoland
Date: 
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:49:08 GMT
Viewed: 
9985 times
  

In lugnet.lego, Erik Olson wrote:
   Maybe they’ll sell it to Disney. They would fix it.

Um, have you seen some of the Disney theme parks as of late? This would be a poor idea. Outsourcing parks like Legoland isn’t a bad idea, if you pick the right company to run them. Six Flags = Bad. However, all of Disney’s Tokyo parks are actually owned by the Oriental Land Company, and they are considered some of the best run theme parks on the planet. But more likely than not, Legoland will get shafted.

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR