To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 55469
55468  |  55470
Subject: 
TLG needs to know what colors are missing in existing elements
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.color, lugnet.parts
Followup-To: 
lugnet.color
Date: 
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:02:50 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
35219 times
  
I am just ‘reposting’ this from Eurobricks website. I think this would be helpful for all us as AFOL’s.

TLG needs to know what colors are missing in existing elements

From TLG:

Hi LEGO Fans,

The LEGO Community Development would like to know which of the already existing elements would be needed most urgently in missing colors. Some optimism presumed the number one of the resulting list could end in a “color change” and might be produced in the future.

To participate - the way is as follows:
Suggestions need to be send by email until the June 30,2010. These suggestions will be sorted and afterwards published for a voting. The final chart will be send to the LCD Team.

For easier handling the suggestions should be aligned to the description of the BrickLink catalogue: http://www.bricklink.com/catalogTree.asp?itemType=P

Suggestions only will be accepted in a color which is still in production. So e.g.“Fabuland brown” is invalid because production of this color was stoped in 1997.

An overview about the actual colors could be downloaded here: 2010 LEGO Color palette

An example:
Part No: 50746
Name: Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3
New color: brick-yellow (tan)


The suggestions should be sent to this email address: ccf(at)x-brick.de

Either post here or on Eurobricks.com website.

I am pretty sure some of you have some ideas! Help out if you can.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: TLG needs to know what colors are missing in existing elements
 
(...) For requests for the same part in multiple colors, I daisy-chained the color numbers and their respective names to avoid an excessively long message. Is that OK? If not, I'll submit my "excessively-long, non-daisy-chained" version. Give it a (...) (14 years ago, 28-Jun-10, to lugnet.color, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR