|
In lugnet.general, Steve Bliss wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Steve Bliss wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Aaron Gershon wrote:
|
What about the 3x6 slopes? Okay, I know they are a little different but
they dont have that texture you are speaking of.
|
Do you mean part 3939?
Going by the data collected on Peeron, this part first appeared in 1978.
For the next ~13 years, the part only appeared in transparent colors.
|
At the risk of picking nits, I seem to recall that
this piece in my old
Space Cruiser from 1978 was opaque blue.
|
Too right -- sorry, I neglected to look at the history of decorated elements.
Sorry. But I think my point is still valid -- part 3939 was
designed/intended to be used as a windshield, not a roof.
|
Sure, but its a rare day that I get to call someone on a parts-related
question, given my usual specialization. Let me enjoy a few minutes of neener
neener, if you please!
Dave!
|
|
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Steve Bliss wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Steve Bliss wrote:
|
In lugnet.general, Aaron Gershon wrote:
|
What about the 3x6 slopes? Okay, I know they are a little different but
they dont have that texture you are speaking of.
|
Do you mean part 3939?
Going by the data collected on Peeron, this part first appeared in 1978.
For the next ~13 years, the part only appeared in transparent colors.
|
At the risk of picking nits, I seem to recall that
this piece in my old
Space Cruiser from 1978 was opaque
blue.
|
Too right -- sorry, I neglected to look at the history of decorated
elements. Sorry. But I think my point is still valid -- part 3939 was
designed/intended to be used as a windshield, not a roof.
|
Sure, but its a rare day that I get to call someone on a parts-related
question, given my usual specialization. Let me enjoy a few minutes of
neener neener, if you please!
|
:)
Steve
|
|
|