 | | Re: Legends: good or bad? —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
| | | | (...) Dear Chris, sorry I have been busy with preparing the FGLTC train show till yesterday. So here comes my answer with some delay. First let me tell you: I collect trains. Yes, I am a train collector - at least a little bit. BUT - of course here (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Legends: good or bad? —David Eaton
| | | | | (...) No, I don't believe that's your point. If that were your point, I'd expect you to be equally annoyed with DUPLO, the Mickey Mouse sets, Jack Stone, etc. If you're against Legends because they're not valueable to you, so what? Why are they a (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Legends: good or bad? —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
| | | | | (...) [snip] (...) I am really annoyed about town junior, Galidor, Jack Ston(ed), Buyonickel and lots of other themes (but those are aming at none-Afols as custumers). (...) I fear there is no room for two lines of Legends - the ones I would like to (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Legends: good or bad? —David Eaton
| | | | | (...) Well, the problem is that a lot of AFOLs have nostalgic value for sets. Old sets even pay off in nostalgia for kids-- there's something appealing about a "golden age" that's included in the word 'Legend'. Lego's cashing in on that. They (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
