| |
In lugnet.admin.general, "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
> Now, with that buffer, work the committee system to load balance. Once the
> site is known, mail the committee and whoever has time to write a review
> speaks up and does so (if several people do have time, maybe let the person
> who most likes the theme(s) the site addresses do the writing). I would be
> willing to be on the committee but with the knowledge that I have time to
> write reviews once in a blue moon...
OK, one step at a time here. Right now, I just want to know if someone can
help with writing reviews. In the future, it would probably make sense to
review a site as soon as it's on the nomination list, so that come Sunday,
the review is already written. I'll do tomorrow's and then I'll talk more
with those who are interesting in contributing.
--
Todd S. Lehman | LUGNET Admin <todd@lugnet.com>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: CLSotW - help wanted
|
| (...) Fine, fine, not trying to overcomplicate things... I'm just saying that I am interested but I need flexibility. Once in a while I have time, but most of the time I don't. I bet a lot of other helpers are in the same situation. Or maybe I'm (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: CLSotW - help wanted
|
| (...) Yes, a commmittee of people on tap seems ideal. May I suggest that we lengthen the cycle so that there is a weeks delay between the vote and when the site is posted. That builds up a buffer of time. Now, with that buffer, work the committee (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
