| |
Hi Holger,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de>
> In lugnet.general, Andy Lynch writes: • <snip>
> > It looks to me that only thing that may get it apart is the fact that • sometimes
> > the bricks flex a little bit, so you could try to push in opposite • directions
> > on the horizontal 1 x 6 beams and try to pry out one of the plates that are • on
> > the cross beam in the middle. If you manage that, then you should be able • to
> > do the same on the other side and take the cross beam out. Then it would • just
> > fall apart.
>
> That is a solution, but does that idea fit the regular way of putting LEGO®
> apart?
>
> > Looks like it's going to be tough.
>
> Ohh, yes - but even constructing something like that must have been very • tough,
> or just coincidence?
I agree the method that I described is a bit un-Lego, but my interest was in
reclaiming the bricks without breaking/destroying any.
If the goal was the make a creation that couldn't be taken apart (as you
indicated), then my vote is that your friend definitely has succeeded!!! :-)
-Andy Lynch
|
|
| |
This has to be the guy who designed the shock towers on the front of the
8448 Super Street Sensation. Rip it apart!
--
Bob Fay
rfay@we.mediaone.net
http://bobfay.users5.50megs.com/index.html
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Bluffs/7900/
"Andy Lynch" <andy@andyandjackie.com> wrote in message
news:004e01c0b78f$baad4da0$0f0112ac@meridianhealth.com...
> Hi Holger,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de>
> > In lugnet.general, Andy Lynch writes: • <snip>
> > > It looks to me that only thing that may get it apart is the fact that
> > sometimes
|
|
|
