 | | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Agreed, CA is swell. But my question to you is, you asked for a discount and got it. Was that just to cover the hassle of getting the replacement parts? Or did you argue that because there were parts missing, you should get a discount for the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Nope.(1) However, I would consider it fair to go to CA, and offer to pay them for the missing parts. (assuming I thought the missing parts were worth it - otherwise, I'd just drop it). James (URL) then, I'm the kind of freak that corrects a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | James Brown wrote in message ... (...) them (...) it - (...) I'd agree with both of you. To be honest, I haven't even gone back to CA for pieces missing or damaged from used sets. The only thing I've gone to them for was stickers from a couple (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) I agree with you. If you get compensated for not having the pieces, there's not much more to complain about. If you know in advance that you can call CA and get replacement pieces for free (which wasn't necessarily the case here), you (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? —Tony Kilaras
|
| | | | (...) While it is true that Target's security is pretty bad, it is also true that Lego's packaging is substandard in terms of preventing theft. (24 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
