Subject:
|
Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 01:44:19 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgSPAMLESS
|
Viewed:
|
7764 times
|
| |
|
|
Rachel Kingston <Kingston@spirit.com.au> wrote:
> Please don't think domesticity, and houses for girls vs murder and mayhem for
> boys, supplement the historical sets with fun educational resources such as
You're right; I didn't mean to say that. Note my distain for the Scala line.
I'd like to see the better non-conflict oriented sets for boys AND girls.
But I also have a hypothesis that these sets would sell really well to
girls. And when I'm looking for a set to buy for my cousins, this is what
I'd be looking for.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) OK well an AFOL mother of a boy(2yrs) and a girl (10yrs) I guess I'm qualified to add something to this discussion. My daughter, would've actually loved the pink cutesy themed sets when she was three to five yrs old. That is when she started (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
