 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct —Eric Joslin
| | | | (...) Just to clarify, my suggestion was meant to inspire the idea that a new hierchy be established (ie, "lugnet.lego-direct", "lugnet.lego-direct.bulk", etc), rather than skipping straight to segmenting lugnet.dear-lego. If the main group in the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct —James Brown
| | | | | | (...) This strikes me as a Good Idea. James (URL) WAAHOO! (people have been looking at me funny since yesterday afternoon - I just can' stop the occaisional WAAHOO! from coming out. :) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) No, but in the case of splitting the group into subgroups, the original charter wouldn't have to change. It's simply lugnet.dear-lego: Open letters to the LEGO Group (not necessarily to be read by anyone at LEGO) and that doesn't necessarily (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
