To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / 863
  Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish)
 
This is something I've wanted to do for awhile now. We just bought a 33galuon fish tank and now have the room for some very cool ideas. Is LEGO safe for fish tanks? Will putting LEGO in the tank have any effects on the fish? Does the plastic leach (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish)
 
(...) This is a follow up to my original post. I know it's bad form to reply to one's own post but I think this one works as an exception. We called TLG on the above question and after some discussions and a call back 'Brian' at Lego stated that the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish)
 
(...) (Hi Dean, sorry to interrupt :) I've seen people say things similar to that before but I've never understood what has led to them feel that way. I don't think there's any such stigma here (there shouldn't be!) about replying to one's own post. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Following up oneself (Was: Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish))
 
(...) [ie, "sorry to follow myself up] (...) There is on Usenet. I'm not sure exactly where it comes from, but it is bad nettiquette. I *think* it's to prevent one person from keeping a thread alive when no one else cares. At any rate, I have seen (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Following up oneself (Was: Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish))
 
(...) Why was this followed up to debate? I don't see anything controversial! :-) Seems like good elaboration for the FAQ. ++Lar (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR