Color : 864


Color / 864	863 \| 865

Subject:	Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:45:45 GMT
Highlighted:	!! (details)
Viewed:	4322 times

I DO NOT support or agree with the above letter. I DO support the notion that you are in fact a big wank. Iain Hendry (23), Toronto (Ontario, Canada), ~$500 pre-'04, ~$500 post-'04. I think LEGO is fun!

Message has 5 Replies:

		Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
(...) You shouldn't look at your mirror while posting on LUGNET... René (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)

		Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
(...) Ok that was TOTALLY uncalled for. And why the heck is your reply spotlighted?! -Bryan Changing newsgroups cuz this kinda crap doesn't belong in dear-lego or color. (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
(...) To quote a previous post I made: "A little more civility and politeness and a little less vitriol go a long way to having people respect your opinion instead of writing you off as a ranting troll." -Orion (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)

		Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
(...) Y'know, what you wrote was o.k. Iain, an' actually kinda funny. But in general, it seems like rtlToronto is against any attempt to resolve the color issue that is paramount to some people. I really, really, honestly do hope that one day TLG (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

		Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
(...) Lets be nice here! - big wank, "eh" would have been kind Canadian thing to write as it would leave it up for debate or disagreement. I see no "facts" to support Ben being a "wank". -Patrick (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)

103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search