To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.colorOpen lugnet.color in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Color / 1461
     
   
Subject: 
Re: Variations in dark blue color.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.color
Date: 
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:30:46 GMT
Viewed: 
8088 times
  

In lugnet.color, David Eaton wrote:
The color variations are probably the worst offenders, though. The differences
in heights, etc, really don't seem that severe to me, although I can tell the
difference when I'm looking for them. The color variants are bad though.
Sometimes individual elements are darker on one side than on the other.

I believe I read somewhere that the ABS pellets are now transparent, and color
is injected during the moulding process?  Whereas before, the pellets came
colored prior to being used.  I could be wrong though.

But as for the color variations that people have been reporting over the past
few months, I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that the QA people DID realize they
had a large quantity of "less-than-ideal" parts.  However, by the time they
discovered this, it was at a critical point of time in the year.  It was either
"dump those parts and re-mould them, but disrupt their production cycle
severely" (i.e. lose even more money), or "use them in sets anyway, learn from
this mistake, and make sure it doesn't happen again".

It may be easy for us to make a decision, sitting in front of our computers, but
I bet the person(s) in charge thought long and hard about this before ultimately
going with the latter choice.

-Bryan

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Variations in dark blue color.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.color
Date: 
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:00:31 GMT
Viewed: 
8213 times
  

In lugnet.color, Bryan Wong wrote:
I believe I read somewhere that the ABS pellets are now transparent, and color
is injected during the moulding process?  Whereas before, the pellets came
colored prior to being used.  I could be wrong though.

But as for the color variations that people have been reporting over the past
few months, I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that the QA people DID realize they
had a large quantity of "less-than-ideal" parts.  However, by the time they
discovered this, it was at a critical point of time in the year.  It was either
"dump those parts and re-mould them, but disrupt their production cycle
severely" (i.e. lose even more money), or "use them in sets anyway, learn from
this mistake, and make sure it doesn't happen again".

The keynote speech at Brickworld 2007 by Richard Stollery, the head of LEGO
community, contained these points and specifically mentioned the orange garbage
truck with pieces you could almost see thorough. They had the choice of not
producing a lot of sets or packaging sub-standard parts because there was not
enough time to redo the botched production runs. He stated these parts would
take about a year to flush out of the system. We first noticed them about 8
months ago so quality should get better about 4 months from now. Also stated was
the fact they are keeping a closer watch on QA to ensure this does not happen
again.

Doug

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR