Subject:
|
Re: LCD draft spec comment
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.lcd
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 May 2004 00:22:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2830 times
|
| |
|
|
> Many creations I have seen and built make use of rotating
> single-stud connections for articulated joints and odd
> angle mounts, so allowing an inherently non-rotating stud
> inlet is a flaw that should be avoided if possible.
Hi
I am currently working on my own version of LCD.
http://www.mr-bucket.co.uk/GLIDE/LCD_File_Format.html
I was thinking of adding some kind over-ride to the angle of movement for each
connection. This clinches it, I will. The format itself could hold single-studs
that lock at 90 degrees or similar as long as the editing programs can brake
these rules at the users request. The locking of angles is still useful
information to have even if its not always used.
LCD should be an aid to building not a set of rules that confine creativity.
For more info on GLIDE take a look at http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=11299
--Dan.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LCD draft spec comment
|
| (...) would find most useful is technic axle in it's hole - there's quite a significant clearance between them. Not sure the best way to handle such things. ROSCO (20 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | LCD draft spec comment
|
| Nothing much seems to be happening with the LCD spec, but I read it through and have a comment, in case anyone is listening. If not, at least this lands in the archives. The "stud inlet" and the "turnable stud inlet" should not be distinguished in (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
