Subject:
|
Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 08:51:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
384 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> > Anyone out there in CAD-land have any suggestions on how to improve the
> > lists here?--
>
> Start by reorganizing the lugnet.cad.* newsgroups. I realize that's not
> going to happen, but that would be the best place to start.
Yes. For starters, consider this. LDraw.org the organization belongs in with
other organizations. LDraw the program ought to be parallel to MLCad and
LEOCad and the other groups devoted to programs. ldraw/parts seems somehow
wrong. Parts at this point are more properly a specialization of dat
Like Steve said, it is not likely to happen, but it's needed.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
