| |
Hi Orion,
> These are relatively simple programs code wise so as long as your sources stay
> available, both these programs can be ported to LDDP plugins with relative ease.
They will... Would you do the adaptation? That would be great!
Philo
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> Hi Orion,
>
> > These are relatively simple programs code wise so as long as your sources stay
> > available, both these programs can be ported to LDDP plugins with relative ease.
>
> They will... Would you do the adaptation? That would be great!
>
> Philo
since we are talking about LDDP plug-ins. are there any news on this:
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=14160
orion, lee? also "Edger" would be a fantastic plug-in!
w.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> > Hi Orion,
> >
> > > These are relatively simple programs code wise so as long as your sources stay
> > > available, both these programs can be ported to LDDP plugins with relative ease.
> >
> > They will... Would you do the adaptation? That would be great!
> >
> > Philo
>
> since we are talking about LDDP plug-ins. are there any news on this:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=14160
>
> orion, lee? also "Edger" would be a fantastic plug-in!
LDDP is going through a major change right now. I'm trying out a new editor
control which seems to be more versatile and supports unicode. The sticking
point right now is writing the code for the syntax highlighter. Once that's
done, I'll probably have a look a IseCalc and Linetrim (and Edger once I learn
more about Java)
-Orion
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> I'll probably have a look a IseCalc and Linetrim (and Edger once I learn
> more about Java)
Where do I find Edger? looks like this page disappeared:
http://www.lummoxjr.com/lego/legos.html
I was thinking of writing such a program, but if it's already written...
Philo
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> LDDP is going through a major change right now. I'm trying out a new editor
> control which seems to be more versatile and supports unicode. The sticking
> point right now is writing the code for the syntax highlighter. Once that's
> done, I'll probably have a look a IseCalc and Linetrim (and Edger once I learn
> more about Java)
The extra versatility is a good thing, but Unicode shouldn't be at all useful
for LDDP since ldraw files aren't (and can't) be Unicode. Am I missing
something?
--Travis
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> Unicode shouldn't be at all useful
> for LDDP since ldraw files aren't (and can't) be Unicode. Am I missing
> something?
No, I was just typing without thinking
-Orion
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> > > Hi Orion,
> > >
> > > > These are relatively simple programs code wise so as long as your sources stay
> > > > available, both these programs can be ported to LDDP plugins with relative ease.
> > >
> > > They will... Would you do the adaptation? That would be great!
> > >
> > > Philo
> >
> > since we are talking about LDDP plug-ins. are there any news on this:
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=14160
> >
> > orion, lee? also "Edger" would be a fantastic plug-in!
>
> LDDP is going through a major change right now. I'm trying out a new editor
> control which seems to be more versatile and supports unicode. The sticking
> point right now is writing the code for the syntax highlighter. Once that's
> done, I'll probably have a look a IseCalc and Linetrim (and Edger once I learn
> more about Java)
>
> -Orion
this is good news indeed! my wishlist for LDDP is still up ;-)
http://www.holly-wood.it/wishlist-lddp.html
bye, w.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > I'll probably have a look a IseCalc and Linetrim (and Edger once I learn
> > more about Java)
>
> Where do I find Edger? looks like this page disappeared:
> http://www.lummoxjr.com/lego/legos.html
>
> I was thinking of writing such a program, but if it's already written...
>
> Philo
you've got mail.
w.
|
|
|
